A love story told in search queries
On 7 February 2010, during Super Bowl XLIV, Google ran its first commercial in the event that American advertising treats as its showcase.1, 2 The spot was called Parisian Love.3 It lasted 60 seconds, contained no actors, no dialogue and no product demonstration in the usual sense, and consisted entirely of words being typed into a search box.4, 5
The sequence begins with "study abroad paris france", moves through "cafes near the louvre", "translate tu es tres mignon", "impress a french girl", "chocolate shops paris france", "what are truffles", "who is truffaut", "long distance relationship advice", "jobs in paris", "AA120", "churches in paris", "how to assemble a crib".2 Music rises underneath. The screen fades on the line "search on". Nothing is explained, and nothing needs to be.
Why the format worked
Advertising a search engine is unusually difficult. The product has no packaging, no showroom and no visual signature beyond a text field, and its function is so familiar that describing it is close to pointless. Most search advertising of the period tried to argue about relevance and results, a discussion Microsoft had opened when it launched Bing in 2009 and began spending heavily to claim better answers.4, 6
Parisian Love declined that argument entirely. Instead of asserting that Google was good at search, it showed a life being lived through search, and let the audience assemble the story themselves.7 Each query is a fragment; the meaning sits in the gaps between them. The viewer does the work of realising that a semester abroad has turned into a relationship, then a move, then a marriage, then a child.
This is what made it effective as brand advertising rather than product advertising. The commercial made no claim about speed, accuracy or index size. It claimed a place in the audience's life, which is a much harder thing to contest. Comscore's ARS testing scored the spot at 51 points, placing it in the top fifth of the commercials the firm had measured, and attributed its performance to the emotional framing and the constant visible presence of the Google interface.4
There is also a quiet argument about the product embedded in the sequence. The queries are imprecise, conversational and occasionally misspelled, and the results are useful anyway. A viewer watching someone type "impress a french girl" and get somewhere with it learns more about the search engine's tolerance for vague human language than any accuracy claim could convey.
Source: Google Youtube
An internal film that became a campaign
The work came from Google Creative Lab, the company's in-house creative group, rather than from an outside agency.5 It had first appeared on YouTube in November 2009 as part of a small series and was not made for television at all.8, 9 Its promotion to the Super Bowl was a late decision, and Eric Schmidt, then chief executive, hinted at the buy on Twitter the day before the game, framing it as a departure for a company that had spent a decade insisting it did not need to advertise.2, 6, 8
That framing was part of the story's appeal. Google had grown to dominance through word of mouth and product quality, and had made something close to a virtue of its absence from mass media.9 Buying the most expensive airtime in American television was, on the surface, a reversal. The choice of film softened it. A 60-second spot with no voiceover, no celebrity and no jokes signalled that the company was entering the format on its own terms.
A template Google kept using
The structure proved durable. Google returned to the search-box device repeatedly over the following decade, in the annual Year in Search films, in campaigns for individual markets, and in later Super Bowl work.5 The company's chief marketing officer, Lorraine Twohill, has described the approach as showing simple love stories through what the products can do, a description that fits both Parisian Love and its 2020 successor.5
Its influence spread beyond Google as well. The search-box narrative became a recognisable advertising form, used by other technology companies and parodied often enough to qualify as a genre, and it remains one of the few advertising devices invented in the era that survives on its own logic rather than on production values.5
Fast Company later described Google as the most important, and an unconventional, brand marketer of the 2010s, and this commercial is where that reputation begins.9 It established that Google would advertise by demonstrating usefulness inside a human situation rather than by making claims about itself, a position the company has held to with unusual consistency.
Written with AI assistance, edited by a human. Find out more about our Use of AI.
1. Wikipedia, "Super Bowl XLIV", retrieved 1 October 2026, for Super Bowl XLIV having been played on 7 February 2010, and for Google's commercial built around a romance in Paris among the advertisements shown during the broadcast. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Bowl_XLIV
2. TechCrunch, Jason Kincaid, "Hell Freezes Over As Google Runs Its First Super Bowl Ad", 7 February 2010, for Parisian Love as Google's first Super Bowl ad, for its telling a love story through a series of search queries that begins with "study abroad paris france", passes through "impress a french girl" and ends with "how to assemble a crib", and for Google CEO Eric Schmidt having sent a tweet before the game hinting at a Google Super Bowl ad. The queries between those three are not listed in the article and rest on the film itself. https://techcrunch.com/2010/02/07/google-super-bowl-ad/
3. Ad Age, "Google: Parisian Love", Super Bowl commercial archive, 2010 entry, undated, for the archive record of Parisian Love as Google's commercial in the 2010 Super Bowl; the entry refused automated retrieval and its title was confirmed from search results only, page not reachable on 1 October 2026. https://adage.com/super-bowl/super-bowl-commercial-archive/2010/google-parisian-love/
4. Comscore, Andrew Lipsman, "Scoring with Super Bowl Advertising: Why Google's 'Parisian Love' Was One of 2010's Best Ads", 4 February 2011, for Parisian Love as a 60 second spot, for its ARS score of 51, which places it among the top quintile of the ads the firm had evaluated, for the factors the analysis credits for that performance (the effective use of music to convey mood and emotion, the demonstration of product convenience, and the prominence of the Google logo and of the search engine itself on screen), and for the spot serving as a defence against Bing's competitive positioning as a "decision engine". https://www.comscore.com/Insights/Blog/Scoring-with-Super-Bowl-Advertising-Why-Google-s-Parisian-Love-Was-One-of-2010-s-Best-Ads
5. Muse by Clios, Tim Nudd, "Google Returns to the Super Bowl With Lovely Sequel to 'Parisian Love'", 28 January 2020, for Parisian Love as a love story "crafted entirely from screen shots of Google searches", created by Google Creative Lab with 1stAveMachine credited alongside, for its 2020 Super Bowl sequel "Loretta" using Google product screens in the manner of the original, for the words of Google's chief marketing officer Lorraine Twohill, "Both are simple love stories told through the lens of our products", first published in her post on Google's blog of 28 January 2020, and for the original having "pioneered a whole genre of spots in which digital companies humanized their cold products through emotional storytelling". The article does not cover the Year in Search films, the campaigns for individual markets or the parodies the body names. https://musebyclios.com/advertising/google-returns-to-the-super-bowl-with-lovely-sequel-to-parisian-love/
6. Search Engine Land, Danny Sullivan, "Google Airs TV Ad During Super Bowl, But Why?", 7 February 2010 (the page shows no date and refers to Schmidt's tweet as yesterday's), added during the retrofit, off whitelist and used for corroboration only, for Microsoft having undertaken a major television campaign the previous year, 2009, to promote its new Bing search engine, for Schmidt's tweet passing on the remark that "Hell has indeed frozen over", and for Google being "somewhat notorious for not advertising itself to consumers". https://searchengineland.com/hell-freezes-over-google-airs-super-bowl-a-35476
7. TIME, James Poniewozik, "The Best and Worst Super Bowl Commercials of 2010", 7 February 2010, for the contemporary reading of Parisian Love as "A simple ad that showcases the efficiency and elegance of the company's search capabilities and in the process tells a love story". https://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1960734_1960750_1960798,00.html
8. Google, Eric Schmidt, CEO, "Love and the Super Bowl", Official Google Blog, 7 February 2010, listed in the verse's sources as the newsroom homepage blog.google and resolved to this post, for Parisian Love having been on YouTube for over three months before the game, for "We didn't set out to do a Super Bowl ad, or even a TV ad for search. Our goal was simply to create a series of short online videos about our products and our users, and how they interact.", and for the decision to share it with a wider audience having followed the video's positive reaction on YouTube. The post does not name the month of the YouTube release. https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/02/love-and-super-bowl.html
9. Fast Company, Jeff Beer, "Why Google was the most important, and unconventional, brand marketer of the 2010s", 30 December 2019, for the same Schmidt statement on a series of short online videos, for "It all started when hell froze over at the 2010 Super Bowl. It was just the frigid situation that Google founders had said would have to happen if they'd ever spend money on a TV ad.", and for the article's assessment of Google as the most important, and an unconventional, brand marketer of the decade. https://www.fastcompany.com/90444095/why-google-was-the-most-important-and-unconventional-brand-marketer-of-the-2010s